Page Summary
pinkdino.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sirfox.livejournal.com - (no subject)
armaina.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dv-girl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hrafnakisa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
demonvaska.livejournal.com - (no subject)
keeperofdreams.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kitsumi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tracerj.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shabm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dustwing.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shatterstripes.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thrivis.livejournal.com - (no subject)
orbyss.livejournal.com - (no subject)
heavymuffins.livejournal.com - (no subject)
strayd0g.livejournal.com - (no subject)
monogato.livejournal.com - (no subject)
squnq.livejournal.com - (no subject)
swordianmaster.livejournal.com - (no subject)
take-walker.livejournal.com - (no subject)
captainsaicin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
captainsaicin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
scale.livejournal.com - (no subject)
weavermage.livejournal.com - (no subject)
silver-r-wolfe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:03 pm (UTC)I've browsed through it a bit, the interface is really nice.. kinda considering getting a spot there.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:06 pm (UTC)Allowance for porn and some non-furry art.
An audience (I'm shallow).
And here's the true winner: Some kind of quality controls. Be that Moderation OR ratings with filtering so I could say, "Show me new work by good artists." or "Show me pieces that have been rated in the top 20%." or: "Show me stuff that no one has rated yet."
The problem with a rating system is that it can be used for grief and conflict so I'd say it'd probably need to be registered accounts only but no one can see the individual ratings that someone gave. Just 'N ratings, average score of P'
Also, the artist should have the ability to block ratings from an individual. It'd also be nice if viewers could say, "Don't count ratings from person X" although that gets into data storage problems. If you just keep ratings, you can keep just a float and an int for (current value) and (number of votes) to average new ratings into the score. It eliminates potential risk that someone might get into your data and say, "Oooh! Bob always votes -50 against Ted." So the blocking options probably really aren't that useful.
Oh! Lastly a sieve so you can say, "I want to see ANYTHING by this artist." or , "I never want to see anything by that artist."
Extrapolating a little, you could also implement some kind of system where if an artist gets way more positive ratings on some piece than they have on average for all their other work it gets mini-featured somewhere. Probably not front-page, but somewhere reasonably accessible. That'd be a cool feature for just seeing, "What's hot and new"
Anyhow... I bet it's not just me. I bet LOTS of people would appreciate not having to dig through fifty pages of badly-drawn hedgehogs on lined paper to find one interesting piece.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:23 pm (UTC)1. General features such as Watch, Favorite, etc.
2. Forum. They're worthless but popular.
3. Slick interface; it's the best way of attracting users.
4. Advertising campaign. You have to overcome the inertia and get people to sign up with the new/existing service and leave FA. That means you have to do everything better then FA, you also need to talk to the FA stars personally and ask what they want, work to get them to your service.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 07:46 pm (UTC)FurAffinity problem: If I'm listening to a piece of music and want to comment or browse further without interrupting the track playback, I have to open it in another window. That's no good. Instead, it'd be rockin' to have the playback occur in a separate horizontal frame (you know, for the timebar and controls and an actual TIME READOUT and a link to click back to the piece's actual page) independent of any other browsing.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 08:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 08:20 pm (UTC)If FA pulled a Deviant/Sheezy and declared they owned our art.
If FA continues the arbitrary and senseless/pointless restrictions on 'acceptable uploads.' (Ones like the 10MB limit aren't senseless. Not being allowed to have more than three pictures of one character at a time, or not being allowed to post SL screenshots that take hours or days of coding and modelling to complete while allowing quick OC sketches that were finished in 5-10 minutes, those are senseless.)
If a version of FA with functional search/filtering, or without the silly restrictions, or with the ability to categorize our favorites and our galleries came into existance.
If trolls began to come to FA again and the moderation continued to deny us certain basic self-moderation tools (requiring mod intervention to delete abusive comments in our own galleries, f'rex).
If FA started using pop-up or pop-under advertisements. (Inline advertisements are okay if not obnoxious, and you can already see where they're planning to put them -- the entire HOMG VISIT FA UNITED ad that was on our pages for several months.)
If FA stopped working in Internet Explorer. Yeah, there are many browsers like IE. But none of them are the browser I use.
If FA's code went open-source. FA has enough security issues without handing trolls the keys and a detailed map.
Well, that's the causes I can think of off-hand.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 08:57 pm (UTC)*sigh*
DA does not 'own' your art
they only 'own' the rights to be able to make, thumbnails, and possibly advertisements in the form of 'hey look at the stuff on DA'
They cannot use your art in the realm of:
Prints, shrits, hats, ect unless you actually use the print service, OR you submitted your design to DA for use on their shirts and hats and they use it, which requires another set of terms to agree to.
-all- art galleries have that sort of 'clause' in the agreement, or else they would not be legally able to make thumbnails for the galleries.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 08:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 09:18 pm (UTC)I still need to get around to uploading stuff to Yiffit! I have so little dirty stuff and so many other things needing my time that it's just fallen off my to-do list; all my art effort since it started has pretty much been either non-furry or working on my comic book...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 09:36 pm (UTC)Is this asking what's wrong with FurAffinity that would make one want to leave? Or is it asking what another archive could have to beat FA?
Reasons for leaving somewhere can be different from reasons to go somewhere else. Responses to this poll seem to talk about both. Just wondering what direction is supposed to be taken.
For me to leave FA, my friends would have to go somewhere else or feedback between me and other folks would have to disappear. I get some nice attention at FA, and it's nice but... I guess it won't be the right kind of attention for long. Might leave soon and spend my energy at communities that are more focused on critical feedback.
For me to go somewhere else, that somewhere else would have to have the same adult screening system where you have to be logged in to view over-rated work. And I would like a place that's both furry and anime, and not so bent on one or the other. Some quality control would be nice as well, to stem the "myspace" spurts of "LOOK AT MEEE" photos. It'd be an art gallery, not a makeshift photo album. >_> Photos can be art, but photos are too often blog-waste. They should go in scraps along with sketches if they achieve little or no artistic value, I say. :|
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 10:03 pm (UTC)Internet's important looool [to furries].
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 10:42 pm (UTC)i like FA otherwise.
besides the usual gripes
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 11:16 pm (UTC)Thankfully, the filters are supposed to be in the works, but if they decided to not include them (and still allow cub porn), then I would find another gallery to post at.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 11:34 pm (UTC)Oh, wait...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 05:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 06:03 am (UTC)Yeah, I'm talking about dA.
I have yet to come across a system that is built to appreciate art for its artistic value, and not the popularity of the artist. That is the greatest downfall of them all...
Yet, it could be done - it is possible, and I even know how... it's just the implementation that stands in the way, and the fact that no administration really cares.
This could change... whether it will or not remains to be seen, but any site has the potential to be the first there, and furry sites are no exception to that.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 01:10 am (UTC)FurAffinity membership to me is just another way to get the rocks off, like FChan and lulz.net.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 02:03 am (UTC)And then I'd just have nowhere to go, because I'm not an artist.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 05:00 am (UTC)That doesn't really have anything to do with leaving FA, but I want one anyway.
Then I could make the time to hang out on other sites without all the pointless lurking.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 05:09 am (UTC)2) categories and subsections for art that make sense and aren't restrictive of content.
3) reasonable and prudent restrictions on allowable content (no CP, underage)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 06:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 08:53 am (UTC)All the flaws which have been listed - drama, cub porn, technical issues - look pretty weak points to me. Drama etc. only exists to be ignored, and so far I have never seen serious technical problems. Even if it cannot be up 24/7 I definitely think the overall value of the archive makes up for it.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 08:57 am (UTC)Eh, nothing really, I don't need a reason to leave. It's just a place to upload my porn port-folio with comments for critique.
Commissions stop, I find a better site, I get an income good enough not to need commissions...all those means I won't need to go on there any more.
Don't need to go there now really. hm. -shrug-
no subject
Date: 2007-08-11 04:44 pm (UTC)That being said, I want filters that work.